Dating sites muncie in Single frauen lüdinghausen
The vast majority of 1970 SS Chevelles in the “For Sale” market do not possess either of these documents; therefore, we will mainly focus on the physical characteristics of the 1970 Chevelle SS rather than the documents themselves.When documentation is no longer available, a thorough inspection of the car’s driveline components and body is imperative.This stamp was done at the final assembly plant and not at the engine plant.It was for warranty purposes and both the front engine pad and the vertical pad directly above the oil filter were used for this stamp.Examining the firewall of a 1970 Chevelle can be very helpful in determining the existence of certain original assembly-line provisions.This information can be compared with the floorpan as well to draw additional conclusions.The big-block Chevrolet engine-assembly plant located in Tonawanda, New York, used a specific dating system for casting the 1970 Chevelle SS: a letter of the alphabet indicating the month, followed by the day of the month, and a “9” for the year 1969 or a “70” for 1970. This would indicate the following: I = September; 12 = 12th day; and 9 = 1969.(Note: Dates that were cast into a mold used the letter “I”, items dated using a stamping method skipped the letter “I” and therefore M would equal December.)The date the engine was assembled, the cubic-inch displacement, and the transmission designation was stamped on the front right-hand side of the engine directly in front of the right-side cylinder head.
But it also must be noted that a few rare cases of SS models have surfaced without the “L” designation.A 1970 Chevelle cannot be proven to be a SS model by examining the VIN (Vehicle Identification Number), nor by examining the Body by Fisher (cowl tag) plate, unless the car was assembled at the Oshawa Canada Plant, which was the only plant to list the RPO codes directly on the cowl tag.Notice the existence of RPO Z25 (SS396) on the tag pictured above.This can be very misleading, as these terms are often used loosely—and even abused.With any assertion, there must be sufficient facts or documents to support the claim in order for it to be deemed accurate.